|
Research at Conference |
AHNA's
30th Annual Conference Re-Visioning Environment:
Creating a Habitat for Healing Colorado Springs, CO
June 3-6, 2010
The other focus for this issue of
Connections is our AHNA conference in Colorado
Springs. This year we had a large number of research
submissions for papers and posters. This year eleven
papers were submitted and 59 posters were submitted
as well (42 were submitted last year).
This year we had 8 research grant proposals
submitted by 7 individuals. Last year we received 9.
The proposals have been reviewed and the recipients
will be announced at conference and then in
Connections.
For the third year, we are offering one-on-one
research consultations at conference. (The
one-on-ones are now full but space remains for the
group consultation "Birthing of a Research Project"
see description below) These sessions are offered at
a minimal fee for help with a research issue. People
have used these sessions for such issues as:
clarifying a research problem they would like to
study, a question of methodology, a question about
funding or analysis, or seeking advice about
publishing results. We are still in need of
consultants who would meet with others. Please
contact Sue Robertson if you are interested in being
either a consultant.
srobertson@fullerton.edu
The research committee meeting will be at conference
this year Thursday, June 3rd from 4:30-6:00 pm
(before the opening ceremony). As usual all are
invited and we will discuss the current projects of
the committee and plans for the immediate
future. (The drumming will not be in the next room.)
Please see the listing of research presentations
that will be happening at conference this year:
Preconference Workshop
Workshop 4.
Research to
Praxis: Using the Evidence to Implement Holistic
Interventions for Practice and Education.
Research
(B) Sue Robertson RN, PhD; Ruth
McCaffrey ND, ARNP, BC, FND, GNP. This
presentation will help you evaluate research
evidence about potential holistic interventions,
develop guidelines to support holistic care, and
measure the effectiveness of holistic
interventions.
Conference Workshops
Workshop 13.
Research Papers
# 1
Research (I, A)
-
Eco-Spirituality: The Experience of
Environmental Meditation in Patients with
Cardiovascular Disease.
Colleen Delaney PhD, RN, AHN-BC; Cynthia
Barrere PhD, RN, AHN-BC. The aim of this
phenomenological study was to describe the
experience of a new environmental meditation
that focused on eco-spirituality with
patients with cardiovascular disease.
-
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: Creating
a Healing Internal Environment for Women
With Fibromyalgia.
Janice Surina Cise DNS, RN, AHNC, BCIA-C.
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) biofeedback
brings about balance between the sympathetic
and parasympathetic systems. Women with
fibromyalgia experienced decreased symptoms
over the eight week training
-
Impact of Reiki on Knee Replacement
Patients: Rating of Pain Before and After
Reiki Therapy.
Carol Fazzini RN, BC; Ruth Mooney PhD, RN,
Barbara Notte RN. Reiki therapy was
administered to patients undergoing total
knee replacement preoperatively and
postoperatively. Mean ratings of pain
decreased after 20 minute treatments.
Workshop 20.
A Mind Body
Intervention for Depression in a Community
Health Setting.
Research & Practice (B) Kathleen M.
Miller RN, MA, PhD. Examine the process,
findings, and experiential elements of a pilot
study on a Mind Body Intervention for Depression
in a community health setting.
Workshop 28.
Research Papers
# 2:
Research. (I)
-
Hand Massage for Insomnia in Nursing Home
Residents.
Marlaine Smith RN, PhD, AHN-BC, FAAN; Anne
Vitale PhD, APN; Jacqueline Staal FNP-BC.
Insomnia contributes to a cascade of health
issues in nursing home residents.
Holistically-focused interventions to
address insomnia in this population are
urgently needed and discussed.
-
Self-healing Practices: Connecting Internal
and External Environments.
Evelyn Clingerman PhD, RN. This
presentation offers knowledge of
self-healing practices through the lens of
an underserved and marginalized group of
Latino and Latina migrant farmworkers.
-
Expert Holistic Nurses' Advice to Nursing
Students.
Glenda Christiaens PhD, RN, AHN-BC; Jo Ann
Abegglen DNP, APRN, PNP; Andrea Gardner BS,
RN. This study describes the advice given
by expert holistic nurses to nursing
students, and nursing students' experience
and perceptions of their interaction with
the experts.
Workshop 31.
Stepping
Stones: Achieving an Integrative Healthcare
Framework.
Education,
Practice & Research (I) Lourdes
Lorenz RN, MSN-IH, AHN-BC, Denise Anthes RN,
BSN, MBA, HTCP/I, HN-BC, Sandra Barkei RN, BSN,
HTCP, HN-BC, Kat Knihnicki Yarboro RN, BSN, PhD,
ThD, HN-BC. Designed by nurses, this innovative
framework was created to promote a healing
culture that inspires personal and
organizational transformation within a hospital
setting. Application of practical ideas for
creating and implementing an Integrative
Healthcare program will be explored using
Holistic nursing education, practice and
research.
Workshop 36.
Reiki Research
Dissemination: The Touchstone Project.
Research
(I) Anne Vitale PhD, APN; Elise
Brownell PhD. Identifies emerging findings,
from the Center for Reiki Research, useful for
holistic nurses and Reiki practitioners.
Patient outcomes, animal studies and Reiki as
self-care will also be presented.
AHNA
Research Poster Presentations
Make sure to see the poster presentations
during one of these two times, in order to
receive CNE:
Friday, June 4, 2010 at 10:30-11:30
am
Poster Session #1
Saturday, June 5, 2010 at 9:00-10:00
am Poster Session #2
1. Is
there a relationship between the use of
Reiki and the self reporting level of
anxiety of a mother of a neonatal abstinence
syndrome baby.
Christine Naoum-Heffernan RN, MS, CPNP,
Reiki Master Teacher, Gilda Castillo, RN,
Jeanine Midy RN, Carolyn Drew RN, MS, CCRN,
Christine Pailler RN, BSN, Jocelyn Lundi RN,
BSN, Janice Weinberg ScD, & Maureen Beirne
Streff EdD, RN, MS, CS, BC Abstract
2. Perceptions of Nursing Faculty and Students
regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine
(CAM).
By Karen Avino EdD, MSN, RN, AHN-BC Abstract
3. Time out for Tea: Guided Imagery Gatherings
for Families and Staff in a Pediatric Oncology
Unit.
Anke Reineke PhD, BCIAC, Lisa Thompson RN, LMT,
CHTP/I, Jeanie Spies RN, MSN, CPNP, & Tamara
Maginot MS Abstract
4. Healing the Air: Essential Oils and Healing
the Effects of Tobacco.
Barbara Cordell PhD, RN, AHN-BC, CCAP Abstract
5. The M
Technique: Creating a Healing Environment.
Jane Buckle PhD, MA, RN Abstract
6. Creating a Healing Environment with Families
who have a Child with Special Health Care Needs.
Sharon Falkenstern PhD, CRNP
Abstract
7. Fostering an Environment of Healing and
Civility in Nursing Education.
Margaret "Marty" Downey RN, PhD, AHN-BC &
Cynthia Clark RN, PhD, ANEF
Abstract
8. Healing at home: empowering family caregivers
to use touch as supportive cancer care.
William Collinge MSW, MPH, PhD & Mary Malinski
BA, RN, LMT, HN-BC
Abstract
9. Spirituality of the Older Adult during
Relocation to Long Term Care.
Cheryl Lantz PhD(c). MS, RN & Dr. Eleanor
Yurkovich, Professor, CNS/NP
Abstract
10. Hypnotherapy as an Aid for Smoking Cessation
of Hospitalized Patients.
Karen Pischke RN, BSN, Joanne Rowley MS, RNCS,
HNB-BC, TTS, Faysal Hasan MD & Sarah Conway BA
Abstract
11. Nurses as a Therapeutic Presence: A Pilot
Project.
Debra Groath ARNP, DNP
Abstract
12. The Journey of Women with Breast Cancer who
Engage in Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction: A
Qualitative Exploration.
M. Velma Weitz CRNP, DrNP, Kathleen Fisher PhD,
CRNP, Vicki Lachman PhD APRN MBE, & Carolyn
Tubbs PhD, LMFT, AAFT
Abstract
13. Religious and Spiritual Coping Among Family
Caregivers of Persons with Early Memory Loss.
Scott Nguy BS & Susan Bauer-Wu, PhD, RN
Abstract
|
|
Birthing of a Research Project |
You are invited to share our story related to the labor
and delivery of our new arrival. Drs. Bernadette
Lange, Carla Mariano and
Rorry Zahourek are pleased to announce
the birth of the following research project: The
Creation of a Legacy Building Model for Holistic
Nursing: A Pilot Study to Capture the Visionary Spirit
of Elder AHNA Members. This project was planned in
order capture the historical roots and development of
holistic nursing and the legacy of AHNA through the
visionary spirit of its elder members.
This Group Consultation will involve you in how the
project was conceived and most importantly, encourage
you to participate and to ask questions about or share
your own experiences with the early stages of creating a
research project.
The project began as a pilot study of three Elder AHNA
members. The data collected will help to initiate an
ongoing, systematic method for the collection of
historical data from other elder holistic nurses
culminating in a perpetual archive of knowledge and
inspiration for holistic nurses presently and in the
future. The research process utilized in this project
will be analyzed and synthesized to develop a Legacy
Building Model providing the AHNA with a consistent
method to archive the wisdom of elder holistic nurses,
thereby contributing to the discipline of nursing's
understanding of a specific body of knowledge - holistic
caring and healing.
So come join us in sharing and learning about the
exciting endeavor of Birthing of a Research Project!
Hurry - sign up now only a few spaces
left! $35 fee.
Register online or call (800) 278-2462 Ext. 21.
|
|
How to Conduct a
Systematic Review of Literature |
Lynn Rew EdD, RN, C, AHN-BC, FAAN
The University of Texas at Austin School o f
Nursing
The current focus on evidence-based
practice begs the question, how do I find
the evidence? One way to search for evidence
is through a systematic review of
literature. Unlike other types of narrative
literature reviews that often end up
unfocused, a systematic review of literature
is conducted just like any other research
process. It begins with a clearly focused
question or questions. For example, if you
want to get a general idea about
complementary interventions used for women
in labor, you might ask, "what types of
complementary and alternative medical (CAM)
strategies are used to control pain and
reduce anxiety among women in labor?"
After clearly posing the research question
or questions, you decide where to search for
the evidence. With current technology,
online search engines become the obvious
answer, but asking known experts for
suggested readings may also be a credible
source of available literature. Because a
systematic literature review is a type of
research activity, the ability for another
person to replicate the process you used is
paramount (Johnson, de Li, Larson, &
McCullough, 2000). Thus you will want to
specify what search methods you used (e.g.,
searching known databases such as the
Cochrane Library, which contains current
systematic reviews, or the Cumulative Index
of Nursing and Allied Health Literature
[CINAHL], which is a trusted source of
published nursing literature).
You will also want to specify what search
terms were used. For the example above,
search terms might include complementary,
alternative, labor, and pain and anxiety.
While writing this, I entered these three
terms into the CINAHL database and found
three papers published in 1998, 2000, and
2008. Using the same terms, I decided to
cast my net a bit more broadly and included
the MEDLINE database. This expanded the
number of found publications to four,
including a paper published in 2006. Being
somewhat dissatisfied with this relatively
small number of papers, I decided to see
what would happen if I looked only for
papers with the term "pain" rather than the
phrase "pain and anxiety." Searching both
CINAHL and MEDLINE together, I found 57
papers published from 1981-2008. And when I
substituted "anxiety" for "pain and
anxiety," I found only eight papers
published from 1998-2008. This shows how
important it is to determine the precise
focus of the research question and the terms
that will be searched. Of course, it is
still possible to use both of these terms,
you just have to keep track of exactly how
many searches you did, with what specific
terms, and what kinds of responses you got.
Hannes, Claes, and The Belgian Campbell
Group (2007) suggest using the acronym PICO
to help in remembering what qualifies as a
clearly focused question. PICO stands for
population focus (P), intervention (I),
control-situation or comparison group (C),
and desired outcome (O). Following our
example: women in labor (P) is the
population of interest, CAM is the
intervention(s) (I), standard intervention
strategies represent the comparison (C)
group, and pain and anxiety are the outcomes
(O). Not all focused questions will contain
a comparison group and, at times, such as in
our example, the comparison group is implied
rather than explicitly identified... Read
More
|
|
Recent Publication Review |
reviewed by Diane Wind Wardell PhD, RN, WHNP-BC,
AHN-BC, CHTP/I
A recent review article on the biofield
therapies of Therapeutic Touch, qigong, reiki,
Healing Touch, Johrie and others was published
in the International Journal of Behavioral
Medicine (2010, 17: 1-16). This excellent
article, "Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of
Hype? A Best Evidence Synthesis" was authored by
Sharmin Janin and Paul Mills from the University
of California and includes a systematic review
of 66 clinical published studies conducted using
a quality assessment protocol and best evidence
synthesis approach to examine biofield therapies
effects on human health outcomes.
The authors begin with a historical overview of
subtle energy and how these practices are being
used in modern culture. Their methods for this
critical review are clearly delineated using the
QUORUM checklist guidelines including the search
strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria for
the studies, data extraction that included
characteristics of the study about the
participants, intervention, methodology,
statistical methods, and outcomes. Points were
given for categories and summated to provide an
overall rating of quality for each study ranging
from -3 to 16 points. Most of the studies were
found to be of average quality and minimum
quality for such things as randomization, use of
controls, and appropriate statistical
measures. Excellent detail is provided in how
these decisions were made and tables of the
studies provided for comparison.
Next the authors provided a best evidence
synthesis on the health outcomes examined in
these studies. In their review of pain-related
disorders they found a variety of a variety of
scales and measures being used as outcome
measures. There was strong evidence for biofield
therapies effect in reducing pain intensity and
improving physical functioning. However, studies
were equivocal in their effects on comprehensive
assessment of pain reduction (i.e. depression
and anxiety) and long term benefits. For those
individuals with cancer, the findings suggest
moderate evidence for reducing acute pain
cancer. There were few studies in cancer
patients related to fatigue, quality of life,
and physiologic indices of the relaxation
response and these studies demonstrated
conflicting evidence.
In hospitalized patients, there was moderate
evidence that biofield therapies reduced
anxiety. There was moderate evidence for
decreasing negative behavioral symptoms in
dementia and there was also evidence that these
therapies were well tolerated by the
participants. There are few studies in the area
of cardiovascular patients and results are
conflicting related to the effects on anxiety
and physiological outcomes.
The authors summarize their findings by stating
they are promising complementary
interventions. They suggest future research
directions to include more thorough assessment
of cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune
variables and also to conduct more comparison
studies with other modalities. One statement
made by the authors was that researchers should
consider following the lead of nursing by using
triangulated approaches of combining qualitative
and quantitative data to provide a more
comprehensive view of the experience and effect
of receiving biofield therapies.
|
|
Critical Reviews and
Meta-Summaries |
Rorry Zahourek reviewes two articles from an issue of
Nursing Research, 2003. While the issue is now several
years old the information has been updated by Sandelowski and
Borroso and most recently (2007) published in a book
chapter. See below.
Marguerite Sandelowski and Julie Barroso have published several
articles and book chapters on meta-analysis, metasynthesis and
metasummary of qualitative data. These have evolved from a
methodological project the purpose of which was to develop a
usable and transparent protocol for conducting systematic
reviews or integration of qualitative study findings.
"Methodological clarification, experimentation, and innovation"
is the major purpose and "process is the primary outcome" .
Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2003).
Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing
Research, 52, 226-33.
Summary
Qualitative meta-summary is differentiated from
qualitative meta-synthesis as a kind of systematic review of
qualitative research more amenable to reports in which findings
are themselves in the form of summaries or surveys of the data
researchers collected in the course of their studies. In
contrast, qualitative meta-synthesis is a kind of systematic
review more amenable to reports in which findings are themselves
in the form of syntheses of data collected in the course of a
study. Techniques for creating meta-summaries include the
extraction and abstraction of relevant findings, and the
calculation of effect sizes. Metasummary is particularly useful
for qualitative survey data. This article describes a process
that evolved from a larger project devoted to metasynthesis
which is more interpretive of the combined results than
metasummary. The authors introduce the concept of effect size
which is usually associated with quantitative research.
The impetus for their work is the need to synthesize and
summarize qualitative data to enhance their use in providing
evidence bases for practice.
Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Voils, C.I., (2007)
Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and
quantitative descriptive findings. Res Nurs Health,
30(1), 99-111.
The authors summarize the article as follows "The new imperative
in the health disciplines to be more methodologically inclusive
has generated a growing interest in mixed research synthesis, or
the integration of qualitative and quantitative research
findings. Qualitative metasummary is a quantitatively oriented
aggregation of qualitative findings originally developed to
accommodate the distinctive features of qualitative surveys. Yet
these findings are similar in form and mode of production to the
descriptive findings researchers often present in addition to
the results of bivariate and multivariable analyses. Qualitative
metasummary, which includes the extraction, grouping, and
formatting of findings, and the calculation of frequency and
intensity effect sizes, can be used to produce mixed research
syntheses and to conduct a posteriori analyses of the
relationship between reports and findings."
In the Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative ResearchSandelowski
M, Barroso J, (2007). Springer, New York describe several
methods for synthesizing and summarizing qualitative research.
Chapter 6 is devoted to metasummary and is a very readable
summary of their work. The entire chapter can be accessed
through googling meta summary in qualitative research or clicking
here.
"Grey
Literature in Meta-analysis" by V.S. Conn, J.C. Valentine,
H.M. Cooper and M.J. Rantz (Nursing Research, 52,
256-61, 2007) is another useful article in considering summaries
of research. The authors discuss including 'grey literature' in
meta-analyses. This literature included unpublished studies and
often work that did not yield statistically significant results.
Because much of such work does not have peer reviewers as
critics many have questioned the validity of the data and the
results of meta-analyses that include such studies. The authors
however contend that the most consistent difference between
published and grey literature is the statistical significance
and the effects sizes are often 1/3 larger. Many such smaller
studies are also less likely to be funded. These authors found
as they reviewed these grey studies that the methodological
rigor did not vary from the larger studies. They advocated that
'grey literature' be included in meta-analyses because when they
are excluded the meta-analyses over represent studies with
statistical significance and they tend to therefore inflate
effect sizes. More precise effect sizes are obtained when
meta-analyses include grey literature. They insist that to truly
reflect the existing evidence base that grey literature be
included in meta-analyses. |
|
Research in the News |
Using Essential Oils To Fight Superbugs
Essential oils could be a cheap and effective
alternative to antibiotics and potentially used to
combat drug-resistant hospital superbugs, according to
research presented at the Society for General
Microbiology's spring meeting in Edinburgh this week.
(Science Daily, 4/10)
Non-drug Techniques Reduce Pain in Hospitalized Patients
Non-traditional therapies relieve pain
among a wide range of hospitalized patients as much
as 50 percent, according to a first-of-a-kind study
in the Journal of Patient Safety. The study shows
that an inpatient integrative medicine program can
have a significant impact on pain in an environment
where pain management continues to be a major
challenge, and traditional medications can have
negative consequences. (e! Science News, 3/10)
M. D. Anderson Receives 4.5 million Grant, Largest
Ever for Study of Yoga and Cancer
In an ongoing effort to scientifically validate
the age-old belief that mind-body interventions
have a beneficial impact on the health of
patients, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center has been awarded more than $4.5
million to study the efficacy of incorporating
yoga into the treatment program of women with
breast cancer.
Click on each
title to read article.
|
|
Grant Opportunities |
- New! Create Low-Cost Cell Phone-Based Applications for
Priority Global Health Conditions
- New! Create New Technologies to Improve the Health of
Mothers and Newborns
- Create New Technologies for Contraception
- Create New Ways to Protect Against Infectious Diseases
Initial grants will be $100,000 each, and projects showing
promise will have the opportunity to receive additional
funding of up to $1 million US Dollars. Full descriptions
of the new topics and application instructions are available
at
www.grandchallenges.org/explorations.
ANF Nursing Research Grants
The ANF Nursing Research Grants Program was
founded over 50 years ago to encourage the research
career development of nurses. This program continues to
grow with contributions for nursing research, from
organizations and individuals. These donations support
scientific research for advancing the practice of
nursing, promoting health and preventing disease.
Each year, through our Nursing Research Grants
program, ANF provides funds to beginner and
experienced nurse researchers to conduct studies
that contribute toward the advancement of nursing
science and the enhancement of patient care. Awards
are given in all areas of nursing, including healthy
patient outcomes, health care policy development,
critical care, gerontology, women's health,
community and family intervention.
The 2010 Grant Application can be accessed at:
www.ANFonline.org. The deadline for all
submissions is May 3, 2010. See the
application for further details and instructions.
|
|
Resources |
|
NDNQI Submission Help
American Nurses Association is offering a live demonstration
on how to submit online, a research proposal for the National
Database of Nursing Quality Indicators® (NDNQI®) Data Use
consideration. This event is scheduled for Tuesday, May 18, 2010
at 3:00 pm ET for 1 hour, and registration is free. The session
will review the proposal criteria, researcher qualifications,
data variables and submission process. NDNQI Research Council
Members will address questions following the demonstration. Sign
up early and submit your question(s) when your
register. Deadline for registration is Friday, April
30, 2010 (space is limited). Contact Email:
marsha.russell@ana.org |
|
AHNA Researchers in Action |
|
Carla Mariano RN, EdD, AHN-BC, FAAIM
published a chapter "Holistic Integrative Therapies in
Palliative Care" in Palliative Care Nursing: Quality
Care to the End of Life (2010, 3rd ed.) edited by M.
Matzo and D. Sherman.
Valerie Eschiti PhD, RN, AHN-BC, CHTP, CTN-A
received funding from the NINR for her project, Native
Navigation across the Cancer Continuum in Comanche Nation.
We would love to hear
about your research. Send your "Researcher in Action" to
info@ahna.org
|
|
Connections Wants You |
We are now looking for another volunteer to edit this
eNewsletter. Its time for the fresh eyes and new
perspectives of another editor. We welcome suggestions or
please volunteer yourself to edit Connections. Rorry will
be happy to help the next person, or willing to be
co-editor. Amber will continue to put the final product
together. Connections is published quarterly. If
you are interested, contact Rorry at
rorryz@aol.com
We are also seeking book reviews for this newsletter. If you
know of a book that may be useful to other holistic nursing
researchers, please send a short review to Rorry. We also
welcome other relevant articles or ideas. |
|